Back to Message Scan
Methodology

How Mossy works

Mossy runs two distinct assessments — claim-level analysis for documents, labels, packaging, advertising, and websites, and a full sustainability communications audit built on the CARE model. Both apply the same 9 regulatory frameworks and evidence standards, but they look at different material and score it differently.

Claim analysis (Message Scan)

A single message, label, packaging or campaign asset

What is assessed

The exact wording and imagery you submit — pasted text, an uploaded document, or up to 8 photos of a pack. Nothing outside the submitted material is considered.

How it works

Each claim in the material is isolated, classified by scope, lifecycle stage and environmental issue, then tested against the 9 frameworks and the evidence hierarchy to identify the level of substantiation it would require.

Language

Every claim analysis is assessed in one fixed language (English), whatever language the material is written in or the report is requested in. Findings, severities, framework links, claim subjects, review flags and the score are fixed at that stage. Only the human-readable wording — summary, explanations and recommendations — is then translated into your report language, so the same material receives the same assessment in every language. Each result shows its assessment and report language.

Each claim's subject is chosen by the AI analysis and checked against the claim wording. When the two do not agree, or confidence is low, the claim is flagged for manual review and its subject stays provisional until a reviewer confirms it.

How the score is produced

Rule-based, not AI-estimated. Every flag carries a weight by severity (high, medium, low) adjusted by claim category, and the weights combine into a single 0–100 risk index. The same findings always produce the same score.

Multiple images

Each image is analysed separately, then merged into one result: flags are deduplicated and the final score follows worst-offender-wins across all panels.

Risk scoring

Each Message Scan produces a risk score from 0 to 100:

0–29 · Low Risk

claims are specific, substantiated and defensible under applicable frameworks

30–59 · Medium Risk

some claims lack specificity or evidence

60–100 · High Risk

claims are vague, unsubstantiated or potentially misleading under applicable regulation

Higher scores indicate greater greenwashing risk. This is a risk indicator, not a legal assessment.

Sustainability Communications Audit

A whole website or body of corporate communications

What is assessed

A crawled corpus of your public communications — homepage, sustainability pages, reports and related content — read as a single communication strategy rather than as isolated statements.

How it works

The CARE model is applied in full: Content, Aim, Reporting and Engagement, equally weighted across 46 criteria. It evaluates not only what is claimed but whether sustainability is embedded in purpose, governance, disclosure and stakeholder dialogue.

How the score is produced

Each CARE dimension is scored on its own criteria and the four are averaged into an overall 0–100 score, so a strong disclosure record can offset weak claim wording, and vice versa. The overall score maps to a four-level verdict scale (see Verdict scale below).

What you also receive

A compliance memo mapping findings to the applicable frameworks, and an optional CARE Sustainability Communications Strategy Report with materiality, audience and channel analysis plus a 90-day plan.

The CARE model — four dimensions

The CARE model was developed by Dr Sara Rego through doctoral research at the Communication and Society Research Centre (CECS), Universidade do Minho. It evaluates sustainability communications across four dimensions, equally weighted, assessing 46 criteria in total. The CARE model was developed by Dr Sara Rego in her doctoral thesis (Universidade do Minho, 2024). Mossy’s implementation, including its scoring rules, prompts, legal-classification mapping and evidence workflow, is proprietary.Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390

CARE criteria are voluntary (Mossy CARE methodology). Legal context is shown separately and is not legal advice. CSRD/ESRS duties concern the sustainability statement for in-scope companies; they do not require CARE content on a public website. Directive (EU) 2024/825 applies to consumer-facing commercial practices as transposed in the relevant Member State. Mapping last reviewed: 28 September 2026.
Reviewed criterion-to-framework mapping

Static mapping last reviewed 28 September 2026. Status is resolved after scoring; no live source or AI-generated legal label is used.

CriterionFrameworkProvisionStatus ruleSource
1.1.1Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
1.1.2Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
1.1.3Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
1.1.4Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
1.2.1Directive (EU) 2024/825UCPD Annex I points 4a and 4b, as amended: generic environmental claims and whole-product or whole-business claimsb2c bindingOfficial source
1.2.2Directive (EU) 2024/825UCPD Articles 6 and 7, as amended: misleading actions or omissions, including the overall presentation of a consumer-facing commercial practiceb2c bindingOfficial source
1.2.3Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
1.2.4Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
1.2.5Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
1.2.6Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
1.2.7Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
1.3.1Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
2.1.1Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
2.1.2Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
2.1.3Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
2.1.4Directive (EU) 2024/825UCPD Articles 6 and 7 and Annex I point 4a, as amended: misleading and generic environmental claims. Applies only where the mission or vision statement forms part of a consumer-facing commercial practiceb2c bindingOfficial source
2.2.1Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
2.2.2Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
2.2.3Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
2.2.4Directive (EU) 2024/825UCPD Articles 6 and 7 and Annex I point 4a, as amended: misleading and generic environmental claims. Applies only where the mission or vision statement forms part of a consumer-facing commercial practiceb2c bindingOfficial source
2.3.1Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
2.3.2Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
2.3.3Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
2.3.4Directive (EU) 2024/825UCPD Article 6(2)(d), as amended: a future environmental performance claim requires clear, objective, publicly available and verifiable commitments set out in a detailed and realistic implementation plan with measurable, time-bound targets, regularly verified by an independent third-party expertb2c bindingOfficial source
3.1.1CSRD / current ESRS, subject to revisionArticles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (as amended) and current ESRS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, as amended): ESRS 2 MDR-A/MDR-T; ESRS E1-1 where climate change is materialreporting dutyOfficial sourceDirective 2013/34/EU
3.1.2CSRD / current ESRS, subject to revisionArticles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (as amended) and current ESRS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, as amended): ESRS 1 double materiality and topical ESRS, where materialreporting dutyOfficial sourceDirective 2013/34/EU
3.2.1CSRD / current ESRS, subject to revisionArticles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (as amended) and current ESRS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, as amended): ESRS 2 GOV-1/GOV-2reporting dutyOfficial sourceDirective 2013/34/EU
3.2.2CSRD / current ESRS, subject to revisionArticles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (as amended) and current ESRS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, as amended): ESRS 2 GOV-1/GOV-2 governance disclosuresreporting dutyOfficial sourceDirective 2013/34/EU
3.2.3Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
3.3.1CSRD / current ESRS, subject to revisionArticles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (as amended) and current ESRS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, as amended): ESRS G1-1, where business conduct is materialreporting dutyOfficial sourceDirective 2013/34/EU
3.3.2CSRD / current ESRS, subject to revisionArticles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (as amended) and current ESRS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, as amended): ESRS G1-1 and topical policy disclosures, where materialreporting dutyOfficial sourceDirective 2013/34/EU
3.3.3Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
3.4.1CSRD / current ESRS, subject to revisionArticles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (as amended): sustainability information in the management report; current ESRS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, as amended); ESRS 1 section 8.2 (sustainability statement in a dedicated section of the management report) and section 9.1 (permitted incorporation by reference): no public website requirementreporting dutyOfficial sourceDirective 2013/34/EU
3.4.2CSRD / current ESRS, subject to revisionArticles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (as amended) and Article 30 of Directive 2013/34/EU: annual reporting and publication through the legally prescribed channelreporting dutyOfficial sourceDirective 2013/34/EU
3.4.3CSRD / current ESRS, subject to revisionArticles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (as amended) and current ESRS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, as amended): material topical ESRS metrics; ESRS 1 section 8.2 (sustainability statement in a dedicated section of the management report) and section 9.1 (permitted incorporation by reference): no public website requirementreporting dutyOfficial sourceDirective 2013/34/EU
3.4.4Directive (EU) 2024/825UCPD Annex I point 2a, as amended: the legal risk is displaying a sustainability label that is not based on a certification scheme or established by public authorities. There is no legal duty to reference certificationsb2c bindingOfficial source
4.1.1Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
4.1.2CSRD / current ESRS, subject to revisionArticles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (as amended) and current ESRS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, as amended): ESRS 2 SBM-2 interests and views of stakeholders; ESRS 1 section 8.2 (sustainability statement in a dedicated section of the management report) and section 9.1 (permitted incorporation by reference): no public website requirementreporting dutyOfficial sourceDirective 2013/34/EU
4.2.2Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
4.2.3Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
4.2.4Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
4.2.6Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
4.2.7Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
4.2.8Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
4.3.1Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
4.3.2Mossy CARE methodologyCARE communication-maturity criterion. Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251 (printed page numbers). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390best practiceOfficial source
C

Content

What companies say and how clearly they say it. Evaluates the specificity, accuracy and clarity of environmental claims — whether language is concrete and substantiated or vague and generic.

A

Aim

Whether sustainability sits in the company's purpose, mission and values — or is treated as a marketing add-on. Evaluates alignment between stated commitments and organisational strategy.

R

Reporting

Targets, governance and transparent disclosure. Evaluates whether companies publish measurable targets, third-party verified data, and clear governance structures around sustainability.

E

Engagement

Real two-way dialogue with stakeholders — not one-way broadcasting. Evaluates the existence of genuine participation mechanisms, feedback channels, and stakeholder-specific communication.

Verdict scale

The overall CARE score maps to a four-level verdict:

0–34 · Weak

Cliché claims, no evidence.

35–59 · Developing

Some commitments, key gaps.

60–79 · Credible

Substantiated, governed claims.

80–100 · Exemplary

Mature, assured, two-way.

Higher scores indicate more mature, substantiated and well-governed sustainability communications. This is a strategic assessment, not a legal opinion.

The 9 regulatory frameworks

Mossy evaluates content against all 9 frameworks simultaneously — distinguishing binding rules, reporting standards, voluntary standards, guidance and proposed legislation.

  • ISO 14021 — Self-declared environmental claims (International)

    The standard governing how companies make environmental assertions about products and services.

  • FTC Green Guides — US guidance on environmental marketing claims (US)

    Federal Trade Commission guidance on what constitutes misleading environmental marketing.

  • UK Green Claims Code — CMA guidance on green claims (UK)

    Competition and Markets Authority principles for making credible environmental claims.

  • CSRD / ESRS — Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (EU)

    CSRD requires in-scope companies to report sustainability information in the management report under current ESRS, subject to revision. Directive (EU) 2026/470 is adopted and in force, but its CSRD changes require national transposition by 19 March 2027. Scope and timing must therefore be checked under the law of the relevant Member State. CSRD does not require CARE content on a public website.

  • EU Directive 2024/825 — ECGT (EU)

    Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition applies to consumer-facing commercial practices from 27 September 2026, as transposed in the relevant Member State. Mossy treats its provisions as binding only for confirmed B2C material and confirmed transposition; unknown audiences are labelled ‘binding if directed at consumers’. B2B and investor-facing material is not labelled binding under this directive.

  • CSDDD — Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (EU)

    Due diligence obligations for very large companies regarding environmental and human rights impacts across their value chain. Under the Omnibus Directive (EU) 2026/470, in force 18 March 2026, mandatory scope is limited to EU companies with more than 5,000 employees and more than €1.5 billion net worldwide turnover, and non-EU companies with more than €1.5 billion EU turnover, applying from 26 July 2029. Companies below these thresholds are out of scope but may face value-chain expectations.

  • EU Green Claims Directive (proposed)

    Proposed EU directive on substantiation and communication of environmental claims. Commission proposal of 22 March 2023 (not adopted). Legislative status unresolved as at 28 September 2026. Mossy uses it only as voluntary best-practice context and never labels it binding.

  • Australian Consumer Law — ACCC (AU)

    Australian Competition and Consumer Commission guidelines on environmental claims — one of the most actively enforced greenwashing frameworks globally.

  • Dutch ACM Sustainability Claims Guidelines (NL)

    Practical enforcement-oriented guidelines from the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets. One of the most actively enforced green claims frameworks in the EU, with a focus on clarity, substantiation, and the overall impression created by environmental marketing.

Evidence standards

In addition to the 9 regulatory frameworks, Mossy references the following internationally recognised evidence standards when evaluating specific types of claims:

GHG Protocol

The global standard for measuring and reporting greenhouse gas emissions. Referenced when evaluating carbon, Scope 1/2/3, net zero, and climate-related claims. Claims using emissions language without reference to GHG Protocol methodology or equivalent are flagged.

ISO 14040 / ISO 14044 — Lifecycle Assessment

The international standards for lifecycle assessment methodology. Referenced when evaluating comparative environmental claims such as “lower impact,” “reduced footprint,” or “better for the planet.” Claims implying lifecycle benefits without a lifecycle assessment are flagged.

ISO 14067 — Product Carbon Footprint

The standard for measuring and communicating product-level carbon footprints. Referenced when evaluating per-product carbon claims. Claims making per-product carbon assertions without ISO 14067 or equivalent certification are flagged.

SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0

The benchmark for science-based and 1.5°C-aligned net zero commitments. Version 2.0 was published on 11 June 2026 and takes effect on 1 February 2027. Version 1.3.1 remains open for target setting until the end of 2027, so both versions run in parallel during the transition; from 1 February 2028, new target submissions must follow Version 2.0. Mossy applies its structure: Category A and B companies, five-year near-term targets for scopes 1 and 2 (and scope 3 for Category A), an optional net-zero target that combines near-term and long-term targets with neutralization of residual emissions by 2050 at the latest, a board-approved transition plan, assured base-year data, annual progress reporting, and carbon credits treated as a complement rather than a substitute for cuts. Claims using “net zero,” “science-based,” or “1.5°C aligned” without SBTi validation or equivalent independent verification are flagged — as are market-instrument or sector-level actions presented as the company’s own emissions reductions.

AI and accuracy

All Mossy analysis is generated by Google Gemini 2.5 Flash via the Lovable AI Gateway. Results are AI-generated and should be treated as risk indicators, not legal assessments. Mossy uses the CARE model methodology to guide AI analysis but results should be reviewed by a qualified professional before acting on them.

Mossy labels AI-generated outputs as such.

Citation

Rêgo, S. (2024). Comunicação para a sustentabilidade: a influência do consumo consciente na comunicação corporativa em tempo Covid-19. Doctoral thesis, Universidade do Minho, ch. IV (section 4.4), pp. 173–177, and Annex 2, p. 251. https://hdl.handle.net/1822/92390